Page 1 of 1

Chi for Ron

Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:11 am
by cavemaneca
simple question really, title says it all.
Player across from me won of my discard, completing a 5-dot 7-dot with my 6-dot .
Now, I thought this was an invalid move? Tenhou has a bug maybe?

Re: Chi for Ron

Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:39 am
by WorTeX
just why would that be a bug? that is just as valid wait as any other wait. If it gave the opponent points for a PINFU with closed wait, then it's a bug.

Re: Chi for Ron

Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:35 am
by cavemaneca
I'm saying, I was south and he was north.
I thought you could only chi of the person to your left.

Re: Chi for Ron

Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 6:23 am
by burke
cavemaneca wrote:I'm saying, I was south and he was north.
I thought you could only chi of the person to your left.
When you go out, you are allowed to complete any kind of set, even the pair. It is not CHII or PON, it is RON.

Re: Chi for Ron

Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:05 am
by cavemaneca
burke wrote:
cavemaneca wrote:I'm saying, I was south and he was north.
I thought you could only chi of the person to your left.
When you go out, you are allowed to complete any kind of set, even the pair. It is not CHII or PON, it is RON.
thnx i didn't realize it worked that way...

Re: Chi for Ron

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 3:02 pm
by Referee
Burke is right. When north claims the 6-pin, he doesn't say "Chi!", but rather "Ron!", and this is unrestricted.

Re: Chi for Ron

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:40 pm
by b4k4ni04
Well, he's restricted to having a yaku worth at least 1-han, but that's a bit of a tangent ^_^;;.

Re: Chi for Ron

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:24 pm
by Referee
OK, point conceded. :P